By Peter Jeff
The Leadership Mints Guy
This is the 1st in a series of 5 posts
on Rhetorical Tips and Techniques
that President Obama could have used
to make his Second Inaugural Address
a departure from the original script.
President Barack Obama’scould have used some rhetorical spice.
At least that’s the feeling of pundits from all political persuasions who were left groping for a memorable phrase –or a meaningful key message– among his 2,147 words following his 18 minute 40 second speech that seemed more bland than grand.
How could a podium pro like Mr. Obama fall victim to such a pedestrian performance from a purely speaking perspective? And what could you do to protect yourself from the same malady if you had to deliver an address to your company as their new leader?
Read on to see how Mr. Obama could have engineered his own “Ask-Not-What -Your- Country- Can- Do -For- You etc” mark in the minds of millions. Read on to learn how you can more fully write and deliver a speech that will leave your audience humming your tune and maybe even dancing to your message.
Read on for a general critique of Mr. Obama’s speech writing efforts. Then explore three follow-up posts that will more fully develop speech writing tips and techniques that Mr. Obama and his speech writing team could have use for a more MEMORABLE opening, a more MEANINGFUL middle and a more MOBILIZING close.
Restructuring Not Rewriting
Then on Friday February 1 this 5 part series concludes with a full RESTRUCTURING –not a rewriting — of the President Obama’s Inaugural Address that more thematically connects all the dots. In fact the final version that I will post on the last day of this five-part series will use ALL of the President’s words in his original script. My intent is to maintain the tone of this speech while helping the audience better tune in to the message.
My objective is not partisan or political. It’s clarity in the communications process from a veteran speech writer’s perspective. My analysis is based on my 30 years in leadership development training and corporate communications helping CEOs frame their remarks, write their speeches, strategically position their thinking. My experience as a speechwriter includes 15 years writing and study the public speaking process in Toastmasters International and 10 years teaching public speaking at the college level.
My bias is that the most effective public speakers influence behavior. Words matter in the leadership process. Yet too often those words are written more for the speaker’s lips than the audience’s ears. That’s why the pundits hailed Mr. Obama’s Inaugural Address as “bold, assertive, aggressive” and “historically significant” yet lackluster, pedestrian and virtually forgettable from the audience’s perspective.
And that has to be regrettable from the speaker’s perspective especially in a speech themed around engaging the populace, to “move forward together” on securing for every American life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as long as we “seize it together.”
There has to be a better way. And that’s what Leadership Mints –the blog you’re reading — is all about: finding a better way to helping leaders freshen their bottom-line thinking, speaking and doing.
So let’s begin with a general critique of President Obama’s Second Inaugural Address. Let’s first discover how a polished speaker like Mr. Obama didn’t live up to his own reputation as a compelling speaker. What went wrong?
Curse of the Explainer-in-Chief
Mr. Obama turned the podium into a pulpit. He turned his speech into a sermon. And he turned himself from the Commander-in-Chief into the Explainer-in-Chief. Great if you’re at a partisan convention but not when you are speaking to a world wide audience listening first for where you’re COMING FROM more than where you are GOING. Inaugurals are more philosophical endeavors, distinct and different from the issues-filled laundry list of a State of the Union speech for example. Lists are far easier to compile than philosophical insights.
So the first step in writing an inaugural speech is to be aware of the Curse of the Explainer-in-Chief. President Obama, a former college professor with a lawyerly logical thinking process, embraces the Explainer-in-Chief role: the tendency to set the dining table– writ large; the tendency to serve the dinner with a full course of platitudes to digest from partisan soup topartisan nuts as if it were a campaign stop. Instead the audience, nearly a million standing in the January cold, are merely listening for a nugget or two to chew on that will satiate their hunger and quench their thirst for an even safer, more secure, prosperous life.
Mr. Obama , an esteemed author of two best selling booksand Audacity of Hope , had a lot to say in his Inaugural Address. So much that he told his speech -writing team to fill various verbal “buckets” with key issues he wanted to share.
How do you reign in a professor-turned-president, a professor who happens to also be prolific speechwriter in his own right ? Not an easy task, especially when his pen sweeps across page after page of his ubiquitous yellow legal pads in midnight musings from his well disciplined lawyerly mind. This president knows what he wants to say and often says it better than anyone else. No wonder the President’s chief speechwriter — Jon Favreau–admitted struggling with writing of this inaugural message.
Yet even a professional writer like Mr. Obama sometimes has to take a step back and really listen to how his speech sounds. Even the best speechwriters know that SOUND THINKING alone does not always produce SOUND SPEAKING. In the next two posts, we will focus on a few speech writing tips and tricks that Mr. Obama and his speech writing team, could have used to develop and deliver a SOUND speech that the audience would long remember and act on.
TOMORROW Part II-Inaugural Spice: Making the Opening More Memorable
Your Comments Invited
Memorable or Miserable? E-mail to email@example.com
SUBSCRIBE: Have a Leadership Mint delivered to your E-mail every business day. It’s free. Just click the SIGN ME UP box in the upper left column.